Rice University’s Baker Institute released a research report examining the impact of straight-party voting on judicial elections in Texas, one of only two states that initially elects, and re-elects, its judiciary in partisan elections where voters have the option of making a single mark/action to vote for all candidates of a party (The other is Alabama.).
The consequence of this combination is “extremely limited variation in the share of the vote received by judicial candidates and a concomitant tendency for judicial sweeps whereby one party wins all of the judicial races within a jurisdiction,” said Mark Jones, the study’s author. From 2008 to 2016, more than 90% of all judges elected were part of a partisan sweep of judicial offices at the state, appellate district and county level, and the trend is toward a greater percentage of partisan sweeps. In 2016, partisan sweeps accounted for more than 95% of all judicial elections.
For example, all one party’s judicial candidates won their elections in three of the last five election cycles in Harris Co. In 2016, Democrats had the largest straight-party vote advantage in county history, and the party swept all 34 countywide offices, including all judicial races.
Subscribers can read the rest of this report.